Site diagnostic and cure
Scan the site. Fix what matters.
Scan 1 public URL across 39 checks in 11 evidence-backed scorecards, then generate 1 implementation-ready prompt to improve it.
Measured evidence
39 checks, 11 scorecards, 2 fetch profiles
Lightmark compares the initial HTML returned to a normal browser and GPTBot. It inspects live HTTP behavior, discovery files, metadata, structured data, accessibility names, scripts, security and privacy signals, trust links, content structure, and conversion paths.
Every failed or partial check includes observed evidence, a focused change, and a done-when condition. The Improve step converts those findings into 1 ordered implementation prompt, while unavailable field data remains an explicit limitation instead of becoming an inferred score.
The 11 scorecards remain independent because a single aggregate grade can hide a serious blocker. Lightmark applies explicit caps when crawler access fails, meaningful raw content is missing, or HTTPS is unavailable, then shows the individual evidence behind every deduction.
Optional standards are scored only when they apply. A site that does not advertise an API or MCP endpoint is not penalized for omitting those contracts; a site that advertises one must publish a discoverable machine-readable definition before that check can pass.
Self-serve plan
Diagnose here. Implement with evidence.
Run the public scan and generate its Improve prompt without creating an account. For hands-on repository changes, request a quote from Adam after reviewing the measured findings.
The self-serve result keeps all 11 category scores, evidence, recommendations, and acceptance conditions visible before the commercial next step, so the quote can begin from an agreed technical scope.
Request implementation quote